Delegate Math: Statistics Of The Week: Clinton is Winning

The DNC has engineered delegate values to the point where they no longer have any meaning. If each delegate represented a proportional number of humans, who would be in the lead, Clinton or Obama?
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.

Read the following linked pages carefully, as you might wrongly presume their greater meaning:

...and:

Now me:

The DNC has socially engineered delegate values to the point where those delegates no longer have any representational meaning.

Go ahead and forget who may or may not have the Popular Vote lead if you must, and instead look at who would be winning if each delegate represented a proportional number of human beings. (And, yes, this takes into account the various permutations for the FL/MI debacle. The math is still clear.)

I thought the days of people being worth 3/5ths a human being were over. I guess if you're an Ohioan, however, you're worth less than an Idahoan.

Yet one more "opportunity" being mined for all it's worth by... him.

Popular in the Community

Close

What's Hot